One of Ours, All of Yours

Is that a threat?

Jan 12, 2026

The Two Days

On January 7, 2026, an ICE agent shot Renee Nicole Good three times in the face through her open car window. She was a 37-year-old mother of three who had just dropped her six-year-old at school. Her apparent crime: sitting in her car while neighbors blew whistles and held up cell phones to document ICE activity in their Minneapolis neighborhood.

On January 8, 2026, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem stood at a podium in One World Trade Center. Behind her hung a message: “One Of Ours, All Of Yours.”

She wasn’t there to address the shooting. She was there to talk about a six-month-old robbery, an off-duty CBP agent mugged in a Manhattan park back in July. The killing of an unarmed citizen the day before went unmentioned except to repeat the claim that Good had committed “an act of domestic terrorism”—a characterization state officials and video evidence would dispute.

Then Noem reminded Americans that Friday was Law Enforcement Appreciation Day. “I’d like to encourage all of you,” she said, “that when you see a CBP officer, an ICE officer... that you thank them, do something nice for them. Buy them lunch.”

One day: an agent shoots an unarmed mother in the face.

Next day: buy them lunch.

The Label

Hours before Noem’s press conference, Vice President JD Vance stood in the White House briefing room and explained why Renee Good was dead.

“There’s a part of me that feels very, very sad for this woman,” Vance said. “Not just because she lost her life but because I think that she is a victim of left-wing ideology.”

He called her “brainwashed.” “Radicalized.” A “deranged leftist.”

He said she was “part of a broader left-wing network to attack, to dox, to assault, and to make it impossible for our ICE officers to do their job.”

He called her death “a tragedy of her own making” and “a tragedy of the far left.”

There is no evidence Good was part of any network. Her ex-husband told reporters she wasn’t an activist—just a mom who had dropped her kid at school. Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara said there was nothing to suggest Good was the target of any law enforcement investigation.

But evidence isn’t the point. The Vice President of the United States said a woman was shot because of what she believed.

That’s the label. “Left-wing ideology.” And that label is doing a lot of work.

Who’s Doxing Whom

Vance accused Good of being part of a network that “doxes” ICE officers.

Let’s define that term. Doxing: publishing someone’s private information—home address, phone number, workplace—to enable harassment or intimidation. It’s a way of saying: We know who you are. We know where you live. We can find you.

Now look at what ICE agent Jonathan Ross was doing when he killed Renee Good.

He was filming her.

Video shows Ross approaching Good’s car with his cell phone out, recording. He circled the vehicle, filming her face, her license plate. He was still holding the phone when he shot her—gun in one hand, camera in the other.

This wasn’t incidental. According to an ACLU lawsuit filed in December 2025, ICE has been systematically using surveillance to intimidate observers:

License plate tracking: Agents use law enforcement databases to scan plates and retrieve home addresses. In at least one case, after an observer followed an ICE vehicle, the agent drove directly to her home.

Explicit threats: Janet Lee and John Biestman, a retired couple in their late 60s, followed an ICE vehicle after a raid at a Richfield church. Agents boxed in their car, pointed guns at them, and said: “We have your license plate. We know where to find you.”

Coordinated propaganda filming: When Susan Tincher was arrested for standing on a sidewalk and asking “Are you ICE?”, a film crew was waiting. The lawsuit states the crew was “clearly coordinating with the ICE agents to gather footage of the arrest and Whipple garage ‘perp walk’ for their own propaganda purposes.”

They’re scanning plates. They’re tracking addresses. They’re telling elderly couples “we know where to find you.” They’re filming people’s faces before they shoot them.

And they accuse the people with whistles of “doxing.”

This is the tell. When someone accuses you of exactly what they’re doing, they’re not describing your behavior. They’re describing their own and daring you to notice.

The Documented Intimidation

The ACLU lawsuit names six plaintiffs. Their experiences form a pattern.

Susan Tincher, 55, arrived at a reported ICE raid in north Minneapolis on December 9. She stood on the sidewalk, six feet from the nearest officer, and asked: “Are you ICE?” Within fifteen seconds, she was tackled and handcuffed face-down in the snow. Agents took her to the Whipple Federal Building, shackled her legs, cut off her bra, and cut her wedding ring, her original band from 32 years of marriage, off her finger. They held her in a cell for five hours, then released her without charges.

Rev. Kenny Callaghan, pastor of All God’s Children Metropolitan Community Church, saw agents circling a young Hispanic woman on January 7—the same day Good was killed, just blocks away. He walked toward her and said: “Take me, stop harassing her.”

An agent immediately raised a firearm to his face. “Are you afraid now?”

Callaghan said no. They handcuffed him and put him in a black SUV. For thirty minutes, agents returned to ask: “Are you afraid yet?”

Before releasing him, an agent said: “You’re white anyway. You wouldn’t be any fun.”

Janet Lee and John Biestman, the retired couple, had guns pointed at them after following an ICE vehicle from a church. “We have your license plate. We know where to find you.”

Other plaintiffs: Alan Crenshaw, pepper-sprayed from a car window after filming an arrest. Abdikadir Noor, a Somali-American citizen for 20 years, detained over four hours with racist rhetoric throughout.

This is “law enforcement” in Minneapolis: Wedding rings cut off. Guns in faces. “Are you afraid yet?” “You’re white—you wouldn’t be any fun.”

And Renee Good, smiling, saying “I’m not mad at you,” three bullets in her face.

The Label Is the Weapon

“Left-wing ideology.” “Marxist.” “Radical.” “Domestic terrorist.”

What did Renee Good actually do to earn these labels?

She dropped her kid at school. She drove through her neighborhood. She sat in her car while neighbors documented ICE activity. She smiled at an agent and said, “I’m not mad at you.”

Dramatic vid filmed by ICE agent who shot Renee Good shows tense stand-off as wife

That’s it. That’s the radicalization. That’s the terrorism.

They call it “Marxist” like an incantation, say the word and the conversation stops. The person is discredited.

But what does Marxism actually mean, stripped of the Cold War baggage?

At its core: the people who do the work should share in the wealth they create. The factory, the platform, the profit—shouldn’t be hoarded by a handful while everyone else fights for scraps. The economy should work for the people who make it run.

Ask any American: Should your wages keep up with productivity, like they did for your grandparents? Should a CEO make 400 times what you make? Should billionaires pay lower tax rates than nurses?

Most people—left, right, center—would answer the same way. So congratulations. By the definition being used to discredit anyone who questions the arrangement, you’re a Marxist too.

This isn’t about state control or bread lines. It’s about recognizing that the balance has tipped so far that the system doesn’t work for ordinary people. That’s not radical. That’s what your great-grandparents fought for when they built the unions. That’s the American Dream—work hard, live with dignity.

But call it “left-wing ideology” and an unarmed mother can be shot in her car and the Vice President will explain she had it coming.

The label does the work.

And if you think you’re safe because you’re not a “leftist”—you’re not paying attention to how this works.

The labels always expand. McCarthy started with actual Soviet agents. But the machine needed bodies, so “communist” expanded until it consumed actors, writers, teachers—anyone who’d been in a room with someone who’d read Marx. COINTELPRO started with the Communist Party, then expanded to civil rights leaders, anti-war activists, and eventually Quakers. The PATRIOT Act was for terrorists; now it’s used for drug cases, financial crimes, tracking protesters.

This is what the machine does. It needs to justify its budget, its personnel, its existence. So the enemy expands. Always.

Today it’s people who document ICE raids. Tomorrow? Parents at school boards have already been called domestic terrorists. Churches sheltering migrants are already being watched.

The machine doesn’t care about your beliefs. It cares about its own growth. And growth requires new enemies.

If you’re cheering because the current target is “the left,” you’re not seeing the pattern. You’re just not seeing that you’re next.

The People at the Top

Here’s what should tell you everything: the people who deploy these labels don’t believe in them.

The Stagecraft That Ushered in the Trump Oligarchy – Mother Jones

Watch the donor class. They funded Obama, then Trump, then Biden, then Trump again. They don’t care about left or right—they care about access, contracts, tax treatment. They’ll call you a Marxist for wanting wages that keep up with inflation. Then they’ll cash checks from whoever wins.

The ideology is for you. The flexibility is for them.

The right has real grievances: IRS targeting of Tea Party groups. FBI investigations on thin predication. Cities burning while media called it “mostly peaceful.” If you’re on the right, you didn’t imagine it and the left should recognize that.

The left has real grievances too: COINTELPRO destroyed movements. Mass incarceration exploded. Police have killed unarmed people on camera without accountability. If you’re on the left, you didn’t imagine it either, and the right should recognize it as well.

Both are real. Both were done by the same machine, operated by different people at different times.

Bush built the PATRIOT Act, Abu Ghraib. Obama kept the surveillance and expanded drone strikes. Trump used the enforcement apparatus. Biden kept the deportation infrastructure.

Different presidents. Same machine. Same boots.

The question isn’t which side you’re on. The question is whether you see what’s actually happening.

The people at the top aren’t fighting left versus right, they just throw gasoline on it. They’re managing a system that extracts from all of us while we fight each other. They need you angry at your neighbor instead of looking up at what they have extracted and prevented you from having at their hands.

They Know What This Is

The same week that message appeared behind Noem’s podium, the administration told the world exactly what authoritarianism looks like.

Iran is burning. Protests across all 31 provinces. At least 538 reported dead, according to opposition groups—though independent verification is difficult amid ongoing blackouts. Internet dark for over 60 hours. Iran’s government calls protesters “terrorists” and “mercenaries.”

Trump, January 2: “If Iran shots and violently kills peaceful protesters, which is their custom, the United States of America will come to their rescue. We are locked and loaded.”

Military options on the table. Because a government that shoots protesters, labels them terrorists, blocks investigation, and sends more forces is engaged in authoritarianism so severe it justifies war?

That’s the definition they gave us.

I’m not equating scale 538 reported dead versus one. I’m comparing the justification sequence:

Same playbook. Same sequence. They defined the pattern themselves.

Put Yourself in That Car

You dropped your kid at school. You drove through your neighborhood. You saw ICE activity and stopped like neighbors have been doing for weeks. Your wife got out to record. You stayed in the car, window down, dog in the back seat.

An agent approaches, filming you with his cell phone. You smile at him. You’re calm. You say: “That’s fine, I’m not mad at you.” while seeing something like this on your street:

After ICE Shooting, Trump Administration Deploys More Agents to Minnesota - The New York Times

Your wife, standing outside, asserts your rights: “U.S. citizen, former fucking veteran.”

Then it changes.

More agents swarm your car. Someone grabs your door handle. Someone reaches through your open window. Someone screams: “Get out of the car! Get out of the fucking car!”

You know what they did to Susan Tincher: tackled for asking a question, wedding ring cut off, held five hours. You know what happens when ICE gets their hands on people. You’re a citizen, but that doesn’t always matter.

Your wife screams: “Drive, baby, drive!”

She’s trying to get back in the passenger side, but the door won’t open.

What do you do?

You do what any terrified person would do. Adrenaline takes over. You back up a few feet. You turn the wheel to the right, away from the agent who has moved himself in front of you. You try to drive away. You leave your wife behind because you are that scared.

The agent doesn’t retreat. He moves toward your open window. He fires three times into your face even when he is clear of the car.

Your car accelerates down the street, uncontrolled. Crashes. A neighbor asks to check your pulse. Agents turn him away.

Someone says: “Fucking bitch.”

Then the agent that fired the shots walks back down that street calmly, gets in an unmarked car with his weapon and it rushed off the scene. He has been shielded from anyone other than the administration from interviewing him. Does that sound like standard practice to you?

Haunted by the stuffed animals in her glovebox: ICE murdered a young mom

Renee Good wasn’t attacking anyone. She was trying to escape. The video shows it. The steering wheel shows it. The fact that she left her wife behind shows it.

She died afraid, alone, three bullets in her face, while a man with a cell phone, doxing her, in one hand and a gun in the other.

The Apparatus

Who are these agents, and how do they operate?

Frank Russo, CBP director of field operations for New York, explained it at Noem’s January 8 press conference:

“The best thing about this operation is that it was done the way law enforcement loves to do it. Quietly, discreetly, behind the scenes, often under the cover of darkness.”

Under cover of darkness. That’s their description.

The agents who came for Good weren’t in marked vehicles or uniforms that clearly identified their agency. Federal agents increasingly wear tactical gear with generic “POLICE” patches—a practice contested in Congress because it obscures which agency citizens are dealing with. California’s Attorney General has warned that immigration agents “may identify themselves as ‘police.’” Members of Congress have urged ICE to remove “POLICE” markings because the public can’t distinguish between agencies or know which rules apply. ICE’s rule vs your police department policies - are not the same.

ICE now has over 22,000 officers and agents—a 120% workforce increase in one year. CBP has over 25,000. Tens of thousands more detailed from other agencies.

Hours after Good was shot, Vance announced what comes next: “I think we’re gonna see those deportation numbers ramp up as we get more and more people online, working for ICE, going door to door.”

Door to door. Under cover of darkness. When you open that door, you won’t know who you’re facing. Just tactical gear and “POLICE.”

The Infrastructure

The machinery keeps growing.

This week: Hudson, Colorado—a closed state prison converting to ICE detention. Glendale, Arizona—part of an 80,000-bed national expansion target. Multiple Congressional delegations—Rep. Omar, Minnesota lawmakers, Rep. Escobar—denied entry to detention facilities on the same weekend.

Coordinated buildout. Coordinated denial of oversight. That’s not local decisions. That’s policy.

Current detention population: over 70,000—the highest in U.S. history, up from under 20,000 at the start of the administration. Target capacity: 107,000+ beds by early 2026. The budget law funds ICE operations through September 2029.

At least 30 people have died in ICE custody in 2025, according to Reuters—the deadliest year since 2004. Four died in a single four-day span in December. A federal judge described conditions as “unnecessarily cruel.” Detainees reported guards calling them “animals” and “pigs,” saying they were fed “dog food.”

For the first time, non-criminal immigrants outnumber those with criminal convictions in ICE custody. The system has shifted from targeting dangerous criminals to detaining anyone it can process.

The machine needs bodies. Today those bodies are labeled “illegal immigrants” and “left-wing radicals.”

The labels can change. The machine’s appetite won’t.

The Question

What do most of us actually want?

Not this. Not agents operating under cover of darkness. Not slogans that read like threats. Not neighbors shot for sitting in their cars. Not wedding rings cut off fingers. Not guns pointed at pastors’ faces with agents asking “Are you afraid yet?”

The American People want something simple: A society that works. The ability to work and be fairly paid. The choice to have a family or not. To love who we love. To feel safe. To live without constant anxiety about schooling, healthcare, housing, and retirement.

That’s not left-wing ideology. That’s not right-wing ideology. That’s just life.

The wealthiest nation in human history could provide this. The money exists. It’s just pooled in fewer and fewer hands while the rest of us fight over what’s left. And irony is to get called radicals for noticing.

Instead, we get an apparatus. Detention beds instead of affordable housing. Surveillance instead of healthcare. A machine that needs enemies to justify its budget, and will always find them.

Renee Good wasn’t an ideology. She was a mother who dropped her kid at school and smiled at a man about to kill her.

“That’s fine,” she said. “I’m not mad at you.”

Then he shot her in the face while her wife screamed for her to drive.

Today it was her.

When the label changes—and it will—what makes you think it won’t be you?

Please watch, then ask yourself this question, “Who are domestic terrorists?”

What Comes Next

The machine doesn’t care about your politics. It doesn’t care about your loyalty. It doesn’t care that you cheered when it came for someone else.

It just needs to keep growing.

And it will—unless enough of us demand something different:

1. Independent investigation access. State authorities must have full access to evidence when federal agents kill state residents. No federal agency investigates itself in secret.

2. Clear agency identification. Federal agents must display which agency they represent. No more generic “POLICE” patches that obscure accountability.

3. Mandatory body cameras. All federal enforcement actions recorded and preserved for oversight.

4. Published use-of-force policies. DHS must publish—and not quietly scrub—its guidelines.

5. Congressional oversight access. Elected representatives cannot be denied entry to detention facilities. Coordinated denial is obstruction, not security.

These aren’t radical demands. They’re minimum standards for accountable law enforcement in a democracy.

The alternative is what we’re watching: an apparatus that operates in darkness, labels dissent as terrorism, investigates itself, denies oversight, and asks you to thank them for it.

Becca Good released a statement after her wife was killed. She wrote about the kindness Renee carried. About holding hands in the car while their son drew on the windows to pass the miles.

Whistles take over Chicago as a popular way to sound alert of ICE

“On Wednesday, January 7th, we stopped to support our neighbors,” Becca wrote. “We had whistles. They had guns.”

That’s the choice in front of us now.

Whistles or guns. Neighbors or enemies. A society that works for the people who live in it or a machine that feeds on them.

We don’t have to accept this.

But first we have to see it for what it is.

A society becomes totalitarian when its structure becomes flagrantly artificial: that is, when its ruling class has lost its function but succeeds in clinging to power by force or fraud.
George Orwell (1956)

Buy Me A Coffee